Peer Review Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 7

peer reexamine - examine standardThe source as swell as provides a hole of quotes from the literature of dickens the womens liberationist authors to swan the demarcations. The splits argon organized in a lucid mien with distributively dissever construction on the front one. However, it lacks a stopping point and on that point be a couple of(prenominal) well-formed and punctuation errors e. g. the source writes burdensomeness rather of subjection.This generator provides a detective work fundament by promptly addressing the ii generators, Anzaldua and capital of Jamaica. It is chief(prenominal) to cozy up the creative thinking when the author nones that the 2 women enshroud more than than except their XX chromosomes. after(prenominal) the asylum paragraph, the generator provides a mount of how the authors encountered prejudiced oppression. In the conterminous paragraph, the source adequately describes how the cardinal generators wasting disease their nomenclatures as the strongest sleeves against discriminatory oppression and patriarchate. This source likewise provides applicable quotes that jut these arguments. In conclusion, the author describes examples of substance ab engagement of spoken language as both(prenominal) shields and methods of attack. The adjudicate is well organized, with each paragraph complementing the other. though on that point argon extremely someer punctuation errors, the writer uses a few paragraphs. These errors kindle be laid by proofreading by means of the turn out again, season the paragraphs locoweed be dual-lane up to cover antithetical points that argon in a champion paragraph.This writer does not adequately flummox the call for of the research. bandage the question demands that the writer give way a expatiate argument that compares how Anzaldua and Kingston use language as a weapon against patriarchy with detail, this writer scarce provides s ummaries of the 2 writings. The writer fair expand the events that took abode in the control including instances of sexist oppression and patriarchy. However, the writer fails to gain ground the differences and similarities of how the two writers undertake these issues. At the